Lack may be a limiting RMS power (for the few people who know what a serving!)Īt this price why hsiter? It's really a great tool.įor once, I'm really happy to Behringer! (J'esprre that I will not change your mind) Prcdemment I built my own filters and needs all ncessaire it! Here I have the tool that allows me to any rgler. With other Systmes the frquence recovery n'tait CONTRL not well (at least an octave with disturbances). The LORD Systm problem of overlap between the speakers (sub and top for example) may rsoudre without much difficulty. I build my speakers gnralement same and I can j'apprcie normment matriser so parameter. I used this Systm with live music and DJ facilities also without problem. There is no info in electro-acoustic, nothing to help the nophyte (fawns but all this is a subject too vast and specialist in the same are not of agree on everything)
The manual is brief, but the use is actually quite intuitive. The paramtrage is quite tedious, how could they have done differently with the same opportunity? Rglages can be locked (in whole or part) and then for fixed installations or lease is impeccable. Trs breath is reasonable and certainly inaudible signal even with a low trs.
And a dynamic eq param (compressor) and output by between (which I've never used)Ī device trs trs complete it may be but not quite pro extrment useful. Limiter per output (the release is a bit faster actually) Delays which may account for the temprature (and thus the speed of sound) 5-band equalizer settings on each input and output Trs complete cross-over (each output has a possibility to have high-pass filter and at the same time a low pass, each with slopes of up 48dB/oct, like Butterworth, Linkwitz, Bessel) Reproduction of recorded music and sound organ, synthesizers, electric guitar, drums and other musical instruments.Ī device with three inputs and 6 outputs, all is fully configurable: In short, the DCX is in my opinion for a beginner who does not have large financial resources because it is comprehensive and easy to adjust ultimately for an attractive rate.īut it has its limitations in terms of the sound quality (low level for me), I could compare with Xilica I have today is much better in this register. Nothing serious for me because once set, I do not touch virtually no (fixed always in the same configuration amps / speakers etc. In addition, it must "revive" xconsole from time to time on the ordo otherwise it tends to "hang". On the other hand in Xilica, use xconsole to adjust if it is really hassle because unintuitive from the front of the unit. The problem was that the bass had become "soft and messy." I found precise bass and punchy with Xilica. The DCX brought me a little breath analog (I could not try because my digital sources are only analog) that bothered me but nothing more. I changed in the meantime and now I have a Xilica XA2040. For my part this material satisfies me in that I actually use. equipment is used properly can easily compete with much more expensive configurations.Īt each make good analysis before buying equipment. torque DEQ Behringer DCX is highly complementary and a very decent quality. DEQ is responsible for bandwidth autoEQ hp in the spatial configuration of the DCX.
The DCX is powered by a DEQ2496 in AES3, this digital connection allows me to carry the signal without loss or distortion at distances of the order of 100 meters and more with DMX cable, this configuration prevents remote amp rack hp cables too long and very expensive. Configuration easy to eouvre places in the acoustic complex. Each amp supports speaker Gemini RS 10 ", 12", 15 ", these speakers have different curves and complementary, I cover the bandwidth evenly. I substituted DCX2496, unwanted by spliter broadband. I made this acquisition 6 months ago to complete a rack PA, where I have 3 amps: 2x200, 2x500, 2圆00 of SLX IISeries MacMah of which were previously distributed by a spliter analog.